LAD/Blog #19: The Dred Scott Decision


LAD/Blog #19: The Dred Scott Decision

The Dred Scott Case (final decision) took place in 1857, and hurried the beginning of the Civil War. The case was over Dred Scott and his wife filing suit against Irene Emerson for their freedom. Dred Scott had been sold to John Emerson (Irene’s husband), and under him had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory, where slavery had been prohibited due to the Missouri Compromise. In 1846, after being hired out, he filed suit for living in free territories without being granted freedom. He may have been dissatisfied with being hired out, about to be sold, or offered to buy freedom and was refused- any of these reasons could have lead to his pushback. John Anderson and the Blow family (Dred’s first owners) helped him during the litigation. In 1846, whether or not they deserved freedom was less important than considering property rights- if they were valuable, could they be taken away because of where the owner took them?

The Dred Scott decision, or Dred Scott v. John F.A. Sandford, ruled that a slave who had lived in a free state/territory was not entitled to his freedom, that African Americans would and could not never be American citizens, and that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. The decision is widely considered the Supreme Court’s worst ever. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney “ignored precedent, distorted history, imposed a rigid rather than a flexible construction on the Constitution, ignored specific grants of power in the Constitution, and tortured meanings out of other, more-obscure clauses.” Taney could have been accused of just faulty reasoning, but he was determined to have a judicial “solution” to the controversy over slavery. Also, Taney maintained that as Scott was not a citizen, he could not sue in federal courts. Ultimately, this case hastened the start of the Civil War (the North was furious), even though Dred Scott was eventually freed.

Image result for dred scott case 
Dred Scott
Image result for 3/5 compromise
Three-Fifths Compromise (synthesis)
The three-fifths compromise was similar to the Dred Scott case in that both said that African Americans were not citizens, and didn't really take into account that they were real human beings- they just took away their rights.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LAD/Blog #2: Peter Zenger

Image
LAD/Blog #2: Peter Zenger #1: Who was Peter Zenger? John Peter Zenger was the printer of the New-York Weekly Journal, the Province's first independent newspaper. He was one of just a few skilled printers of that area during his time. He printed some controversial material regarding Governor William Cosby in the 1730s, and, as a result, was charged with seditious libel. #2:What was the controversy over his charges? There was a lot of controversy over Zenger's charges. The most difficult part was that the truth of the statements that he printed didn't matter, and, he didn't even write those statements. The Cosby administration decided to take action against him because without him, they thought, the paper would not have been printed. However, he was not the person who crafted those statements; therefore it was controversial that he went to court. If the jury found Zenger responsible for the libelous material, Judges De Lancey and Philipse (allies of Cosby) would
Read more

LAD/Blog #35: Home was a Horse Stall

Image
LAD 35: Home was a Horse Stall The story of Sox and her family, especially during WWII, is extremely sad and heart-wrenching. On February 19, 1942, FDR passed Executive Order 9066, establishing military areas across the West Coast, and limiting activities in them, as well as later the Civilian Exclusion Order No. 27, which said that “all persons of Japanese ancestry” were not allowed on the West Coast. One of the first parts of the story that was tough to read was when the news came about Pearl Harbor, and it said that Yumi’s “native country was now the enemy.” It was hard to see how Japanese Americans were forced to stay away from certain shops, and were discriminated against- the “land of the free” wasn’t really that. Another part that was shocking was reading about the conditions these innocent people were forced to live in- dirty horse stalls with bathrooms far away, and without the great majority of their belongings. It was terrible to see how these people were treated, just bec
Read more

LAD/Blog #38: Truman Doctrine

Image
LAD #38: Truman Doctrine On March 12th, 1947, President Harry Truman announced what is known as the Truman Doctrine. Following WWII and the rise of the USSR as a global superpower, America became worried about the spread of communism, and adopted a policy of “containment” in regards to it. Truman issued the Truman Doctrine to address this, regarding the regions of Greece and Turkey. He begins by saying how Greece has sent an “urgent appeal for financial and economic assistance.” He says that Greece doesn’t have very many natural resources, and had a really hard time during WWII. He says that now, Greece doesn’t have enough funds to rebuild and finance imports to help themselves. He also said that Greece was being threatened by communists, and couldn’t defend themselves- they needed our help, and had nobody else to turn to (Britain had helped them, but couldn’t any longer). He said that we had to preserve democracy there, and everywhere. He then spoke about Turkey, and said they were in
Read more